Performance Appraisals | career development | manpower planning | human resource management | leadership | talent management | talent management
Performance appraisal, also known as employee appraisal,
is a way by which the job performance of an employee is evaluated (generally in
terms of quality, quantity, cost and time). Performance appraisal is a part of career
development.
Performance appraisals are a regular assessment of employee performance within organizations.
Generally, the aims of a scheme are:
• Give feedback on performance to employees.
• Identify employee training needs.
• Document criteria used to allocate organisational rewards.
• Form a basis for personnel decisions: salary increases, promotions, disciplinary
actions, etc.
• Provide the opportunity for organizational diagnosis and development.
• Facilitate communication between employee and administrator.
• Validate selection techniques and human resource policies to meet federal
Equal Employment Opportunity requirements.
• A common approach to assessing performance is to use a numerical or scalar
rating system whereby managers are asked to score an individual against a number
of objectives/attributes. In some companies, employees receive assessments from
their manager, peers, subordinates and customers while also performing a self assessment.
This is known as 360° appraisal.
The most popular methods that are being used as performance appraisal process
are:
• Management by objectives (MBO)
• 360 degree appraisal
• Behavioral Observation Scale (BOS)
• Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)
• Trait based systems, which rely on factors such as integrity and conscientiousness,
are also commonly used by businesses. The scientific literature on the subject provides
evidence that assessing employees on factors such as these should be avoided. The
reasons for this are two-fold:
1) because trait based systems are by definition based on personality traits, they
make it difficult for a manager to provide feedback that can cause positive change
in employee performance. This is caused by the fact that personality dimensions
are for the most part static, and while an employee can change a specific behaviour
they cannot change their personality. For example, a person who lacks integrity
may stop lying to a manager because they have been caught, but they still have low
integrity and are likely to lie again when the threat of being caught is gone.
2) Trait based systems, because they are vague, are more easily influenced by office
politics, causing them to be less reliable as a source of information on an employee's
true performance. The vagueness of these instruments allows managers to fill them
out based on who they want to/feel should get a raise, rather than basing scores
on specific behaviours employees should/should not be engaging in. These systems
are also more likely to leave a company open to discrimination claims because a
manager can make biased decisions without having to back them up with specific behavioural
information.